Chapter 6 - THE COURTROOM OF FIRE AND MONEY
Grant’s trial began sixteen months after the explosion.
Deputy Fire Marshal Fraser testified first.
She displayed photographs of the disconnected automatic shutoff.
The propane release point.
The remote igniter concealed beneath the patio structure.
“Could this system have failed accidentally?” the prosecutor asked.
“No.”
“What would have happened if Claire and Lily Bennett remained inside?”
“The likely outcome would have been fatal.”
Nolan Pierce testified next.
He admitted accepting $200,000 from Grant.
Half before the explosion.
Half promised after the insurance payout.
“What instructions did Mr. Bennett give you?”
“To make the kitchen appear to be the source.”
“Why?”
“Claire made coffee every morning.”
“Did he discuss Lily?”
“Yes.”
“What did he say?”
“That piano lessons would remove her from the house.”
“And if the timing changed?”
Nolan looked toward Grant.
“He said the result could still solve more than one problem.”
The defense attacked Nolan as a criminal seeking a reduced sentence.
Nolan agreed he was guilty.
Then he pointed toward the payment records, burner phones, recovered device, and audio files.
“He left evidence,” Nolan said.
The prosecutor played Grant’s voice.
“Claire turns on the coffee machine at eight fifteen.”
Then:
“The child leaves before then.”
Then:
“If they are still inside, that solves more than one problem.”
Several jurors looked toward Grant.
He did not react.
Dana testified about the trust.
She explained that Grant could not inherit the principal.
She showed the forged summary Victor Shaw created.
“Could Claire authorize Grant to pledge the trust?” the prosecutor asked.
“No.”
“What happened if Claire died?”
“The assets remained protected for Lily.”
“What did Grant receive?”
“Nothing automatically.”
The motive became clear.
Grant needed me dead.
Then he needed control over our child.
Dr. Foster admitted she wrote a capacity assessment without ever meeting me.
She accepted Grant’s money.
Used his descriptions.
Prepared language supporting emergency restriction of my rights after the planned incident.
“Did you know he intended violence?” the prosecutor asked.
“No.”
“Did you ask why he anticipated his wife would suddenly become incapacitated?”
“No.”
“Why not?”
Dr. Foster lowered her head.
“Because he paid me to produce an answer, not ask questions.”
Victor Shaw testified that Grant requested a trust summary showing him as successor beneficiary.
Shaw knew it was false.
He justified it as a negotiating document.
The forged summary allowed Grant to borrow millions.
The defense tried to separate the financial fraud from the explosion.
The prosecutor connected them through dates.
Loan deadlines.
Policy increases.
Payments to Nolan.
The scheduled fire.
The rental property.
The sabotaged car.
It was not a desperate decision.
It was a project plan.
May you like
Grant had treated murder like an investment strategy.
---
